SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6235

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
PHILIP THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE TAX OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46773 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.K.KRISHNA, SHRI.ACHYUTH MENON, SHRI.JOY P.J., SHRI. V. HARISANKAR, SMT.ANNA ANTO
For the Respondents: SMT.RESHMITHA R CHANDRAN

Input tax credit entitlement is determined by submission date under Sec.16(5) of the CGST Act, overriding earlier deadlines in Sec.16(4).

Headnote:This judgment examines the rejection of input tax credit under the CGST Act. The petitioner contended entitlement under Sec.16(5) despite initial rejection due to late return submission as per Sec.16(4). The court acknowledged that Sec.16(5) overrides previous stipulations. Consequently, the court directed reconsideration of the credit benefit claim.

Result: The order quashing previous decisions and mandating reassessment.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's registered taxpayer status under cgst. (Para 1)
2. court's recognition of sec.16(5) impacts on credit. (Para 2)

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is a registered taxpayer under the provisions of CGST/SGST Act. The challenge raised in this writ petition is against Ext.P3 order passed under Sec.73 of CGST Act by which, the input tax credit was rejected on the reason that the petitioner failed to submit the returns for the month of March 2020 within the stipulated time period under Sec.16(4) of the CGST Act . The challenge is raised against Ext.P3 order mainly on the ground that, in the light of Sec.16(5) of the CGST Act , which is newly introduced, the petitioner is entitled to claim the input tax credit, in view of the fact that the petitioner submitted the return for the month of March 2020 within the cutoff date i.e, 30.11.2021, contemplated under Sec.16(5) of the Act.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I find merits in the said submission. It is discernible from Ext.P3 order that, indeed, the petitioner submitted the returns on 02.11.2020 for the month of March 2020 in GSTR 3B. As per Sec.16(5), a tax payer who submits return on or before 30.11.2021 shall be entitled to claim input tax credit covered by the same. This is particularly because, Sec.16(5) starts with the wordings "Notwithstanding anything contained in Sub Sec.4". Therefore, this would mean that, once the assessee satisfies the conditions in Sec.16(5), the timeline stipulated under Sec.16(4) loses its significance. Therefore, an interference is required.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, quashing Exts.P3 and P4 orders with a direction to the 2nd respondent to reconsider the matter and to grant the benefits under Sec.16(5) of the CGST Act , if the petitioner is otherwise entitled to the same. Necessary orders in this regard shall be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top