SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6236

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
BIJU PUTHUSSERY – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 27510 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER, SRI.D.M.NOWFAL, SMT.FOUSIYA RAYINMAKI
For the Respondents: SHRI.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, SHRI.V.V.JOSHI, SHRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS, SRI.JOEMON ANTONY, SRI.RENISH RAVEENDRAN, SRI.ANTONY NILTON REMELO, SMT.ANJANA P.V.

Petitioners can withdraw a writ petition at any stage, subject to court approval.

Headnote:Writ petition was filed by the petitioners fearing legal action. The court permitted the petitioners to withdraw the petition, concluding that the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. This decision adheres to procedural aspects of withdrawal in civil proceedings.

Table of Content
1. petitioners sought to withdraw their writ petition. (Para 1)
2. court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the petition. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

2. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top