BIJU PUTHUSSERY vs THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6236

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6236

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
BIJU PUTHUSSERY – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER, SRI.D.M.NOWFAL, SMT.FOUSIYA RAYINMAKI
For the Respondents: SHRI.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, SHRI.V.V.JOSHI, SHRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS, SRI.JOEMON ANTONY, SRI.RENISH RAVEENDRAN, SRI.ANTONY NILTON REMELO, SMT.ANJANA P.V.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

2. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6236

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JBIJU PUTHUSSERY – AppellantVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
BIJU PUTHUSSERY – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE – Respondent