SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6244

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MUHAMMED HARIS K K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RAMEEZ NOOH, SMT.FATHIMA K., SHRI.DANIC ANTONY, SMT.KRISHNENDU K.V., SMT.JENNA SUSAN BAJI
For the Respondents: SHRI.MOHAMMED SHAFI.K, SHRI.RAFEEK. V.K., SRI.SHAHIM BIN AZIZ, SHRI.MUHAMMED YASEEN K. K.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

Permission is granted. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top