Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6244

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MUHAMMED HARIS K K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41923 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RAMEEZ NOOH, SMT.FATHIMA K., SHRI.DANIC ANTONY, SMT.KRISHNENDU K.V., SMT.JENNA SUSAN BAJI
For the Respondents: SHRI.MOHAMMED SHAFI.K, SHRI.RAFEEK. V.K., SRI.SHAHIM BIN AZIZ, SHRI.MUHAMMED YASEEN K. K.

A party can withdraw a writ petition which leads to its dismissal without prejudice.

Headnote:The petitioner filed WP

(C) No. 41923 of 2025 seeking relief, but during the proceedings, the learned counsel requested permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted permission for withdrawal, resulting in the dismissal of the petition. The key issue revolved around the withdrawal request. The court concluded that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

Permission is granted. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6244

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JMUHAMMED HARIS K K – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 41923 OF 2025

A party can withdraw a writ petition which leads to its dismissal without prejudice.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MUHAMMED HARIS K K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41923 OF 2025