Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6247

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SAUMYA RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46962 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.JIJI, SMT.M.M.BABY, SRI.PRATHEESH PRABHA
For the Respondents: SRI.SUBIN K SUDHEER, SHRI.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM ABDUL SAMAD, SHRI.SHIBAS IBRAHIM, SHRI.AMAL BABY, SRI.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

A writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn, allowing for future petitions regarding the same matter.

Headnote:The petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petition while retaining the liberty to file a fresh one. The Court, in its judgment, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, affirming the petitioners' request. The conclusion noted the court's observance of procedural rights and potential future actions of the petitioners.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one.

Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6247

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JSAUMYA RAJAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 46962 OF 2025

A writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn, allowing for future petitions regarding the same matter.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SAUMYA RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46962 OF 2025