SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6247

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SAUMYA RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46962 OF 2025



Important Points

A writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn, allowing for future petitions regarding the same matter.

Subject

Civil - Writ Petition

Headnote

The petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petition while retaining the liberty to file a fresh one. The Court, in its judgment, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, affirming the petitioners' request. The conclusion noted the court's observance of procedural rights and potential future actions of the petitioners.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.JIJI, SMT.M.M.BABY, SRI.PRATHEESH PRABHA
For the Respondents: SRI.SUBIN K SUDHEER, SHRI.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM ABDUL SAMAD, SHRI.SHIBAS IBRAHIM, SHRI.AMAL BABY, SRI.RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one.

Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top