Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
ABHIJITH JAYARAM – Appellant
Versus
STATION HOUSE OFFICER KUMILY POLICE STATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks protection from threats. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. government pleader outlines circumstances of case. (Para 3) |
| 3. court finds inadequate grounds for protection. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner apprehends threat to his life from respondents 3 and 4 and hence he has approached this Court seeking police protection.
2. Though notice to respondents 3 and 4 have been served, they have not entered appearance.
3. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that petitioner and the 4th respondent were in a relationship and when the 3rd respondent insisted on a marriage, petitioner backed out. Thereafter, though a crime was registered against the petitioner, the victim has refused to give any statement against the petitioner. It is also stated that other than registration of the crime, there is no reason for any apprehension of threat from respondents 3 and 4.
4. The circumstances mentioned as revealed from the pleadings in the writ petition as well as the submission of the learned Government Pleader indicates that a crime has already been registered against the petitioner. However, the victim has refused to give any statement against the petitioner. Consider
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
