SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6251

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
RICHARD CLEMENT CHRISTIAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 951 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD
For the Respondents: SRI.M.DEVESH, SRI.M.ANUROOP, SHRI.MURSHID ALI M., SMT.JYOTHIS MARY

Dismissal of a petition as not pressed does not imply a decision on the merits of the case.

Headnote:The court analyzed the procedural aspects concerning the Criminal Miscellaneous Case and the submission of the learned counsel that the matter is not pressed. Subsequently, it concluded that the case could be dismissed on those grounds. The primary issues were whether the petition should proceed under the current status. The court reasoned that dismissing a case as not pressed does not reflect on its merit but is an acknowledgment of the petitioner's non-pursuit. Consequently, the Crl.M.C. is dismissed as not pressed.

ORDER

Dated this the 30th day of January, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Crl.M.C.

is not pressed and hence it can be dismissed as not pressed.

In the light of the above submission, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top