SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6252

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. Pratheep Kumar, J
A.K. Mohanan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 5318 OF 2024 | CC NO. 4095 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Smt. Gisa Susan Thomas, Smt. A.R. Divya, Smt. Adhithya K.
For the Respondents: Sri. T.P. Pradeep, Sri. P.K. Sathees Kumar, Sri. R.K. Prasanth, Smt. Minikumar M.V., Shri. Jijo Joseph

The court emphasized the principle of quashing proceedings when disputes are amicably settled and not serious in nature.

Headnote:This petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. concerns Crime No.2073/2021 pending as CC.No.4095/2021. The accused are charged under IPC Sections, having allegedly caused hurt to the complainant. The court finds the matter amicably settled, quashing the prosecution. The order aims to prevent further court abuse. The final decision is that all proceedings against the petitioners are quashed as of 30th January 2026.

Table of Content
1. petition filed under b.n.s.s. for quashing proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. settled disputes warrant quashing of cases. (Para 4 , 5)
3. final decision to quash all proceedings. (Para 6)

ORDER

Dated this the 30th day of January, 2026 This is a petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. , by the accused persons in Crime No.2073/2021 of Thiruvalla Police Station, which is pending as CC. No.4095/2021 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thiruvalla. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 341, 323, 324, 342, 506(1) r/w 34 IPC.

2. The prosecution case is that on 02.02.2020 at about 03.00 p.m., the accused persons voluntarily caused hurt to the defacto complainant and when CW2 intervened, they wrongfully restrained CW2 and voluntarily caused hurt and intimidated them and thereby they are alleged to have committed the aforesaid offences.

3. According to the petitioners, the dispute has been settled with the defacto complainant/victims/respondent No.3 & 4 and all of them agreed to drop all further proceedings relating to the above dispute. Therefore, the petitioners prayed for quashing all further proceedings against them.

4. The Defacto complainant and victims filed affidavits endorsing the averments in the Criminal MC. According to them, the case has been amicably settled and that they do not intend to proceed with the case and also that further proceedings in the case can be quashed. They have no further grievance against the petitioners.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, after getting instruction from the investigating officer also submitted that the dispute has been settled between the parties and that the victims are not at all interested in continuing the prosecution against the petitioners.

6. Considering the fact that the offences involved in this case are not heinous and very serious, but purely of private in nature and now the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties, quashment of the same is necessary for maintaining harmonious relationship between them and also to prevent abuse of process of the court.

In the result, this Crl. M.C is allowed. All further proceedings against the petitioners in CC. No.4095/2021 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thiruvalla arising from Crime No.2073/2021 of Thiruvalla Police Station, stands quashed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top