IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SHAHUL HAMEED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
Dated this the 30th day of January, 2026 The petitioner, who is the 1st accused in S.C.No.1111 of
2025 of the Special Court for SC/ST (POA), Act Cases, Manjeri, filed this Crl.M.C under Section 528 of the BNSS , 2023, praying for quashing all further proceedings against him. The offences alleged against the petitioner and the co-accused are under Sections 376D , 376(2)(n), 506 and 377 of the Indian Penal Code and various Sections of the SC/ST (POA) Act.
2. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, now the entire dispute between the petitioner and the de facto complainant has been settled. Therefore, he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.
3. The petition was opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The de facto complainant/3rd respondent has affidavit stating that the entire dispute between herself and the petitioner has been settled and that, she has no objection in quashing the proceedings against the petitioner. From Annexure A2 judgment, it can be seen that, when the de facto complainant was examined as PW2, she deposed that there was no incident in which she was raped. She also stated that she does not know the 2nd ac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.