SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6266

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SAMAD M.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.AJEESH M UMMER
For the Respondents: SHRI.NITHIN THAMPI

C.S.DIAS, J.

------------------------------------------

Crl.M.C. No. 132 of 2026 --------------------------------------------

Dated this the 30th day of January, 2026 ORDER The petitioners are the accused 1 to 3 in SC No.1809/2024 on the file of the Special Court – Offences Under SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989, Ernakulam, which has originated from Crime No.270/2024 registered by the Kottappady Police Station, Ernakulam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115(2), 118(1), 110, 296(b) and 351(3) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 (1)(r) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment Act 2015).

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the filing of the complaint has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure-3 affidavit, affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top