Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SAMAD M.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the offences and settlement between parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion of the arguments presented by both parties. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. legal precedents on exercising quashing powers. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. determination of applicability of inherent powers based on case specifics. (Para 7) |
C.S.DIAS, J.
------------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No. 132 of 2026 --------------------------------------------
Dated this the 30th day of January, 2026 ORDER The petitioners are the accused 1 to 3 in SC No.1809/2024 on the file of the Special Court – Offences Under SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989, Ernakulam, which has originated from Crime No.270/2024 registered by the Kottappady Police Station, Ernakulam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115(2), 118(1), 110, 296(b) and 351(3) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 (1)(r) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Amendment Act 2015).
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proce
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
