Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
REDHUL V.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court accepts amicable settlements to quash charges. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties resolved disputes with no objection to case progression. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. inherent jurisdiction invoked based on settled cases and minimal offense severity. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
O R D E R Dated this the 30th day of January, 2026 The petitioners are the accused 1 to 5 in C.C.No.23/2025 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-III, Ernakulam, which has arisen from Crime No.603/2024 registered by the Cheranalloor Police Station, Ernakulam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 115 (2), 118(1) and 126(2) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 and 3, who have executed Annexures III and IV affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
