Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ANEES KA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners sought to quash proceedings based on a settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court assessed the absence of grievance from the complaining party. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court confirmed the appropriateness of quashing based on established precedents. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 3 in C.C.No.121 of 2025 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-I, Kothamangalam ('Trial Court', in short), which originates from Crime No.1663 of 2024 registered by the Kothamangalam Police Station, Ernakulam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 296(b), 115(2) and 118(1) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure A3 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
