SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6280

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
RASHIK MON – Appellant
Versus
FEBINA – Respondent
OP (FC) NO. 56 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.DEVESH, SRI.M.ANUROOP, SHRI.MURSHID ALI M, SMT.JYOTHIS MARY, SMT.S.K.SREELAKSHMY

Proceedings challenging a sale proclamation require challenging the underlying order first.

Headnote:In this judgment, the High Court evaluates the petitioners' challenge to a sale proclamation without contesting the underlying Family Court order, revealing a lack of legal basis for appeal. The court emphasizes the necessity of direct recourse to the Family Court for resolving claims related to the decreed amount. Consequently, the petition is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to sale proclamation without contesting the family court order. (Para 1)
2. court's requirement for challenging prior orders. (Para 2)
3. relief sought requires direct court action. (Para 3)

Devan Ramachandran, J.

The petitioners challenge Ext.P5 - sale proclamation, but without challenging the order of the learned Family Court, Malappuram, which settled it.

2. We are afraid that we cannot find favour with the petitioners, even though they say that they want an opportunity to settle the entire decree; alternatively pleading that the amount that they have to pay is only as per an alleged agreement between the parties earlier. This is because, without challenging the order of the learned Family Court proclaiming to sell the property, they could not have filed this petition assailing the sale proclamation. It is well known that, in the orders allowing the sale proclamation, learned Courts would have dealt with every aspect as impelled before it. However, in this case, we are not aware of what exactly went through the Court's mind at the time when the sale proclamation was settled because it is not under challenge.

3. If the petitioners require any relief, either they will have to move the learned Family Court itself, including for indulgence to pay off the decreed amount, or any other amount that the parties may agree; or invoke other remedies as are available to them in law.

This Original Petition is, therefore, dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top