SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6284

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
VASANTHI – Appellant
Versus
SAJU KUMAR – Respondent
RSA NO. 1349 OF 2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: B. KRISHNA MANI

A party may dismiss their appeal by not pressing it further, leading to a dismissal for lack of pursuit.

Headnote:This judgment concerns RSA No. 1349 of 2015, where Vasanthi and her legal representatives appeal against the judgment of the Additional District Court. The counsel for the appellant mentioned the appeal is not being pressed, leading to its dismissal. The Court found no merit for further proceedings as the appellant is not pursuing the appeal. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that he is not pressing the appeal.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

EASWARAN S.

JUDGE

AMR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top