Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6285

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
BHARATHAN – Appellant
Versus
REMA MENON – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 695 OF 2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.DINESH MATHEW, J.MURICKEN, SRI.N.R.SANGEETHARAJ, SRI.VINOD S. PILLAI, KUM.GAYATHRI MURALEEDHARAN, SMT.SREELAKSHMI R.
For the Respondents: SRI RENJIT GEORGE, SR PP

The court may allow the discontinuation of a case when the matter becomes infructuous, as raised by the petitioners.

Headnote:The petitioners in Crl.M.C No. 695 of 2020 sought to discontinue proceedings as the matter was rendered infructuous. The court observed that the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted this, and based on this, the court allowed the Crl.M.C to stand closed. The final order was made on 30.01.2026.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the Crl.M.C need not be continued, since the matter has become infructuous.

Recording the aforesaid submission, the Crl.M.C stands closed.

sd/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6285

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMG.GIRISH, JBHARATHAN – AppellantVersusREMA MENON – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 695 OF 2020

The court may allow the discontinuation of a case when the matter becomes infructuous, as raised by the petitioners.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
BHARATHAN – Appellant
Versus
REMA MENON – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 695 OF 2020