Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: SRI.SUDHEER G. (PP), SRI.RENJIT GEORGE (SR.PP)

The court ruled on the non-pressing of criminal miscellaneous cases, leading to their dismissal.

Headnote:This judgment addresses the Criminal Miscellaneous Cases involving the petitioner against the order of the Sub Divisional Magistrate. The petitioner is represented by counsel who submits that the cases are not pressed, resulting in the court's decision to dismiss them as not pressed. The core issue revolves around whether the submissions presented warrant continuation or dismissal. The court concludes by dismissing the applications.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Crl.M.Cs are not pressed.

Accordingly, the Crl.M.Cs are dismissed as not pressed.

sd/

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :