IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
JAYAMON ANAND – Appellant
Versus
G.PRAGEETH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the accused was convicted under s.t.no.637 of 2016. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court found no illegality in the conviction. (Para 3) |
| 3. the appellant requested time for compensation payment. (Para 4) |
| 4. the court adjusted sentencing based on compensation willingness. (Para 5) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the accused in S.T.No.637 of 2016 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kadakkal. He was convicted and sentenced by the learned Magistrate for the commission of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of three months, and to pay fine Rs.3 lakh with the default clause of Simple Imprisonment for three months. The entire fine amount was directed to be paid as compensation to the complainant. In the appeal preferred before the Sessions Court, Kollam, the learned Sessions Judge confirmed the conviction as well as the sentence of imprisonment awarded by the learned Magistrate. However, it was clarified that the amount of Rs.3 lakh awarded by the learned Magistrate will be treated as compensation under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. With the above modification, the appeal was dismissed by the learned Ses
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.