Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
SURESH VAZHAKANDI HOUSE, CHERUKUNNU, POOTHADI, WAYANAD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction for voluntary hurt under section 323 ipc. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion and outcome of the appeal related to sentence modifications. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. reasons for confirming conviction and modifying the punishment. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
The concurrent findings of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Sulthan Bathery, and the Additional Sessions Court (Adhoc II), Kalpetta, convicting the petitioner for the commission of offence under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860, and the modified sentence imposed by the Appellate Court, are under challenge in this revision.
2. The prosecution case is that on 15.10.2003, at about 4.10. pm, the accused criminally trespassed into the courtyard of the house of the defacto complainant, and inflicted voluntary hurt upon her by pushing her aside and beating with hands. Accordingly, the Sub Inspector of Police, Kenichira, had filed the Final Report before the learned Magistrate alleging the commission of offences under Sections 447 and 323 IPC .
3. After the completion of trial with the examination of 7 witnesses as PW1 to PW7, and the marking of 5 documents as Exts.P1 to P5, and also after appreciating the evi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
