SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6292

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEWS
For the Respondents: SRI SUDHEER G., PP

Table of Content
1. challenge to concurrent verdicts in criminal cases. (Para 1 , 5 , 6)
2. evidence evaluation and testimony discrepancies. (Para 2 , 4 , 11)
3. final ruling on conviction and sentencing modification. (Para 3 , 10 , 12)

ORDER

The concurrent verdicts of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Pathanamthitta and the Additional Sessions Court, Pathanamthitta, in C.C.No.210/2003 and in Crl.Appeal No.399/2005 respectively, convicting and sentencing the petitioner for the commission of offence under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860, are under challenge in this revision.

2. The prosecution case is that on 11.07.2003 at about 8.00 pm, the petitioner inflicted voluntary hurt and grievous hurt upon PW1, his wife, by stabbing injury with a knife upon the palmar aspects of her right and left hands. It is stated that the relationship between the petitioner and PW1 got estranged, and that he was nurturing enmity with PW1. Thus, the Sub Inspector of Police, Koipuram Police Station had filed the Final Report before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Pathanamthitta, alleging the commission of offences under Sections 324 and 326 IPC .

3. In the trial before the learned Magis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top