JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. The petitioner also prays for a writ of mandamus ‘directing respondents to grant time up to 28-02-2026 to complete the sale of the secured property in terms of the agreement for sale and to clear the entire dues payable to the 4^th respondent bank directly out of the sale proceedings, and for a further direction that all coercive steps, including confirmation of sale, be kept in abeyance till the consideration of Ext.P5 representation by respondents 1 to 3’.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the

4^th respondent bank would submit that the petition is nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. It is pointed out that the petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing W.P(C)No.12306 of 2024, which was disposed of on 11-04-2024, permitting the petitioner to clear the liability in 18 equal monthly instalments. It is submitted that no amount was paid by the petitioner in terms of the directions issued by this Court in the judgment dated 11-04-2024 in W.P(C)No.12306 of 2024, thereby forcing the ban