SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6299

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. GOPINATH P., J
NILESH – Appellant
Versus
THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, OCHANTHURUTHU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 72 GROUP – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 10046 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.DILISH JOHN, SMT.RESHMA MOHAN
For the Respondents: SRI.B.ASHOK SHENOY, SRI.P.S.GIREESH, SHRI.ARJUN R NAIK, SHRI.UMASANKER U.U., SHRI.ADITYA A. SHENOY, SMT. C.S SHEEJA (GP)

Judicial relief denied when prior case findings establish ineligibility for relief.

Headnote:The writ petition was filed by a party in a prior civil case (W.P

(C) No. 46481 of 2025). The court found that in light of the findings from the earlier case, the petitioner was not entitled to any relief. Hence, the writ petition was dismissed. The primary legal issue concerned the entitlement to relief given the precedent set in the referenced case. The court concluded unequivocally that the petitioner's claims did not warrant any judicial relief based on previous determinations.

JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed by the 2nd respondent in W.P(C)No.46481 of 2025, which has been disposed of by separate judgment today (30.01.2026).

In the light of the findings in the judgment in W.P(C)No.46481 of 2025, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief in this writ petition.

The writ petition fails and it is, accordingly, dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top