SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6306

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
JAYMOL MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (CO-OPERATION) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 31827 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.RETHEESHKUMAR, SRI.MUHAMED JUNAID V.
For the Respondents: SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM, SRI.ATHUL V. VADAKKEDOM, SRI. V.K SUNIL

A borrower may be allowed to repay secured loans in instalments despite defaults.

Headnote:The case revolved around the enforcement of multiple loan repayments under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The petitioner, having secured loans from the 3rd respondent bank, sought to repay the outstanding dues in instalments. The court found merit in the request, allowing repayments split into 15 monthly instalments. The bank's counsel did not oppose this arrangement, indicating a collaborative resolution. Ultimately, the court directed the bank to accept the repayment plan to settle the outstanding amount with conditions if any defaults occur.

Table of Content
1. petitioner availed loans and defaulted. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner requested instalment repayment. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court allowed instalment repayment. (Para 6)
4. court disposed of writ petition. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Petitioner availed credit facilities from the

3rd respondent bank. On default being committed proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner under the provisions of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act , 1969, and awards were obtained determining the liabilities of the petitioner. On the awards being put to execution, the petitioner approached this Court by filing the above writ petition.

2. During the course of hearing, petitioner has confined the relief to an opportunity for repaying the outstanding amount in instalments.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the

3rd respondent bank submits the bank has obtained three separate awards under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act . 1969. It is submitted that the petitioner availed two separate loans in her name. It is submitted that the other loan was availed by third parties and that loan is also secured by a mortgage over the property belonging to the petitioner, which is being proceeded against to recover the amounts due under the awards obtained by the bank in respect of the loans referred to above. It is submitted that total outstanding amount in respect of all the three loans put together, as on

30-01-2026, is Rs.6,74,051/-.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, though one loan out of the three loans referred to above was not availed by the petitioner, since the repayment of that loan is also secured by the mortgage of the property belonging to the petitioner, the petitioner may be permitted to clear the liability in respect of all the three loans in instalments.

5. The learned counsel for the respondent bank has no objection to this suggestion of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the submissions made as recorded above, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to repay the total outstanding amount in 15 instalments.

7. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent bank to accept repayment of the entire outstanding amount of Rs.6,74,051/- (as on 30-01-2026) along with any accrued interest, costs and bank charges from the petitioner in the following manner:

i. The petitioner shall pay the total outstanding amount of Rs.6,74,051/- (as on 30-01-2026) together with any accrued interest, costs and bank charges in 15 equated monthly instalments;

ii. The first instalment shall be paid on or before 28-02-2026. The subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before the last working day of the succeeding months;

iii. In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with the law;

iv.In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top