Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6310

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
GIRIJAN C M – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OFFICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 34836 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.PAUL BASTIAN
For the Respondents: SHRI.K.M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN, SMT. SILPA N.P (GP)

The court upheld the withdrawal of a writ petition as per the petitioner's request, affirming procedural compliance.

Headnote:The case concerns WP

(C) NO. 34836 OF 2025, where the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition on 30.01.2026. The court considered the request and dismissed the case as withdrawn. The court acknowledged the statutory context under which the writ was filed while assessing the procedural compliance of the petitioner. The critical issue framed was the admissibility of the withdrawal request, leading to the court's final determination that the writ petition stands dismissed as per the petitioner’s request.

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition is taken up for consideration today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6310

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMGOPINATH P., JGIRIJAN C M – AppellantVersusASSISTANT REGISTRAR OFFICE – RespondentWP(C) NO. 34836 OF 2025

The court upheld the withdrawal of a writ petition as per the petitioner's request, affirming procedural compliance.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
GIRIJAN C M – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OFFICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 34836 OF 2025