SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
SURESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL SALE OFFICER CO-OPERATIVE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OFFICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43360 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.VISHAK.K.JOHNSON, SHRI.VISHNU MOHAN, SMT.PARVATHY S., SMT.MARILIN ROMEO, SHRI.REHIM RAWTHER
For the Respondents: SRI V.K SUNIL

Petition dismissed as infructuous due to closure of loan account, resulting in lack of further orders.

Headnote:The judgment concerns WP

(C) NO. 43360 OF 2025, where the petitioner contended that the loan account in question was closed, leading to the dismissal of the petition as infructuous. The court found no need for further orders based on this fact. The petitioner had complied with necessary legal requirements as discussed. Consequently, the judgement dismissed the petition as no actionable issue remained.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the loan account, which is the subject matter of the writ petition, has been closed. Therefore, no further orders are necessary in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top