SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
SURESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL SALE OFFICER CO-OPERATIVE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(GENERAL) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43408 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.VISHAK.K.JOHNSON, SMT.PARVATHY S., SMT.MARILIN ROMEO, SHRI.VISHNU MOHAN, SHRI.REHIM RAWTHER
For the Respondents: SMT. SILPA N.P (GP)

The dismissal of writ petition due to the subject matter being resolved renders further judicial intervention unnecessary.

Headnote:The petition concerns WP

(C) regarding the closure of a loan account. The court was informed that further orders were unnecessary due to the closure. The court found no merit to continue the proceedings resulting in dismissal as infructuous. The final disposition reflects the court's acknowledgment of the issue's resolution.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the loan account, which is the subject matter of the writ petition, has been closed. Therefore, no further orders are necessary in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P., JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon