SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6316

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
DEEPA P R @ DEEPA SURESH – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL SALE OFFICER CO-OPERATIVE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.VISHAK.K.JOHNSON, SMT.PARVATHY S., SHRI.VISHNU MOHAN, SMT.MARILIN ROMEO
For the Respondents: SRI. V.K SUNIL (GP)

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the loan account, which is the subject matter of the writ petition, has been closed. Therefore, no further orders are necessary in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top