SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6316

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
DEEPA P R @ DEEPA SURESH – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL SALE OFFICER CO-OPERATIVE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43453 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.VISHAK.K.JOHNSON, SMT.PARVATHY S., SHRI.VISHNU MOHAN, SMT.MARILIN ROMEO
For the Respondents: SRI. V.K SUNIL (GP)

A writ petition is deemed infructuous when the subject matter, such as a loan account, is closed, and no further orders are necessary.

Headnote:This Writ Petition under WP

(C) NO. 43453 OF 2025 addressed the closure of a loan account. The court found that no further orders were necessary once the loan account was closed. The primary determination was thus the dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous on 30.01.2026. The final ruling confirmed the court's decision to dismiss.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the loan account, which is the subject matter of the writ petition, has been closed. Therefore, no further orders are necessary in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top