SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6329

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
JANCY DAVIS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.CHRISTINE MATHEW, SHRI.RAPHAEL THEKKAN, SMT.AISWARYA E J VETTIKOMPIL
For the Respondents: SRI MATHEW JOHN (K), SHRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN, SRI.ABY J AUGUSTINE, SMT.PHILIA KOSHY

JUDGMENT

Sri.Rapheal Thekkan, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner as well as the additional 7th respondent are living together as of now.

In view of the above submission, I am of the opinion that no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Therefore, this writ petition would stand closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach this Court, if necessity arises in future.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top