Court affirms the need for administrative response to grievances concerning land encroachment, ensuring timely and fair judicial remedy according to local regulations.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is stated to be the owner in possession of an extent of 44.55 Ares in Re. Survey No.333/4 of Block No.29 of Thakazhy Village. According to the petitioner, an encroachment has been effected by respondents 5 and 6 in the neighboring property by encroaching in the Puambokku land. In support of the afore, the petitioner also seeks to rely on Exts.P2 sketch. The petitioner has further filed Ext.P7 before the 1^st respondent seeking appropriate action to be taken in the matter.

2. I have heard Smt.C.G.Bindu, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. Sunil Nath learned Government Pleader, Sri. R.Raj Pradeep, learned counsel for the 4^th respondent and Sri. B.J.John Prakash, learned counsel for the 5^th respondent.

3. Having considered the rival submissions as well as the connected documents, I am of the opinion that the complaint raised by the petitioner as above with reference to Exts.P2 and P3 requires to be considered by the 1^st respondent herein. In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the respondents 2 and 4 to take note of Ext.P7 and pass appropriate proceedings in the matter after hearing the petitioner as well as respondents 5 and 6 within a period of eight weeks from today. This writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-