IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is stated to be the owner in possession of an extent of 44.55 Ares in Re. Survey No.333/4 of Block No.29 of Thakazhy Village. According to the petitioner, an encroachment has been effected by respondents 5 and 6 in the neighboring property by encroaching in the Puambokku land. In support of the afore, the petitioner also seeks to rely on Exts.P2 sketch. The petitioner has further filed Ext.P7 before the 1st respondent seeking appropriate action to be taken in the matter.
2. I have heard Smt.C.G.Bindu, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. Sunil Nath learned Government Pleader, Sri. R.Raj Pradeep, learned counsel for the 4th respondent and Sri. B.J.John Prakash, learned counsel for the 5th respondent.
3. Having considered the rival submissions as well as the connected documents, I am of the opinion that the complaint raised by the petitioner as above with reference to Exts.P2 and P3 requires to be considered by the 1st respondent herein. In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the respondents 2 and 4 to take note of Ext.P7 and pass appropriate proceedings in the matter after hearing the petitioner as well as respondents 5 and 6 within a period of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.