SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6334

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
TPS GRAMIN NIDHI LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 23182 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR, SMT.A.SALINI LAL, SHRI.ADITYA DEV, SMT.NIKITHA SURESH
For the Respondents: SMT. O.M. SHALINA DSGI

Prior judicial findings on similar issues can determine outcomes in related writ petitions.

Headnote:The statute under consideration relates to Nidhi companies as outlined in the Nidhi Rules 2014 and subsequent amendments. The court found that the present writ petition issues were addressed by a prior judgment. The court framed the key issue as whether earlier judicial findings could determine the current petition. The court ruled that the writ petition was disposed of per the aforementioned judgment.

J U D G M E N T

The issue involved in this writ petition has already been considered and decided by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Annamanada Gramakshemam Nidhi Limited v. Union of India [2024 (3) KHC 429]

In the light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the Judgment referred to above.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top