Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6335

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
PARTHIP MURALI – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 23998 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.JAYAKRISHNAN, SRI.S.PARAMESWARA PRASAD
For the Respondents: SRI.NIRMAL S., SC, CBSE, SHRI.NIRMAL.S

A petition can be dismissed as infructuous if the issues raised are resolved or no longer relevant.

Headnote:This judgment concerns WP

(C) NO. 23998 OF 2023 wherein the petitioner argued for relief under relevant educational statutes. The petitioner, a student, submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous, leading to its dismissal. The court concluded that the submitted argument warranted the dismissal of the petition as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this wit petition has become infructuous.

Recording the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6335

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JPARTHIP MURALI – AppellantVersusCENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION – RespondentWP(C) NO. 23998 OF 2023

A petition can be dismissed as infructuous if the issues raised are resolved or no longer relevant.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
PARTHIP MURALI – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 23998 OF 2023