SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6337

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
JAIMOL MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SRI.M.SAJJAD
For the Respondents: SRI SUNIL NATH, GP

JUDGMENT

Heard Smt.Jensiya, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Sunil Nath, learned Government Pleader.

2. The issue raised in this writ petition is already decided in favour of the petitioner by a Division Bench of this Court in Ext.P11 judgment dated 13.12.2021. It is further pointed out that an appeal preferred by the State against the afore judgment is also rejected by the Apex Court by an order dated 28.02.2023 in S.L.P.(C)

No.4420/2023.

In the light of the afore, this writ petition would stand allowed.

There will be a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s case, in tune with the directions issued by this Court in Ext.P11 judgment.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top