The court upheld the precedence established in earlier judicial findings regarding Nidhi companies, reinforcing the legal context in which the case was evaluated.

Headnote:This judgment examines issues involving the writ petition by Royal Parappanad Nidhi Limited against multiple respondents from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. The court refers to a precedent in Annamanada Gramakshemam Nidhi Limited v. Union of India, disposing of the present petition in conformity with that ruling. The petition is resolved favorably, ordering disposal as stated.

JUDGMENT

The issue involved in this writ petition has already been considered and decided by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Annamanada Gramakshemam Nidhi Limited v. Union of India [2024 (3) KHC 429].

In the light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment referred to above.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6339

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JROYAL PARAPPANAD NIDHI LIMITED – AppellantVersusUNION OF INDIA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 43587 OF 2023

The court upheld the precedence established in earlier judicial findings regarding Nidhi companies, reinforcing the legal context in which the case was evaluated.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
ROYAL PARAPPANAD NIDHI LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43587 OF 2023