Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
HINDH LIYAKATH ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the necessity of preserving evidence for ongoing criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. the court's role in examining procedural requests under article 226. (Para 2) |
| 3. the court's direction for preservation of evidence. (Para 6) |
| 4. final decision of the court regarding the writ petition. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
The prayers in this Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are as follows:-
“A) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction commanding and compelling the 3rd & 4th respondent to make necessary arrangements in preserving the CCTV footage of Museum Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram from 13.05.2025 to 15.05.2025 and 22.05.2025 to 23.05.2025 including footages of Front Entry, GD Desk, SI Cabin , Crime Wing Camera, SHO Cabin.
B) Pass such other writ order or direction that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case; and”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. The petitioner seeks preservation of the CCTV footage of Museum Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, from 13.05.2025 to 15.05.2025 and from 22.05.2025 to 23.05.2025
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
