IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
HINDH LIYAKATH ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 1367 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the necessity of preserving evidence for ongoing criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. the court's role in examining procedural requests under article 226. (Para 2) |
| 3. the court's direction for preservation of evidence. (Para 6) |
| 4. final decision of the court regarding the writ petition. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
The prayers in this Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are as follows:-
“A) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction commanding and compelling the 3rd & 4th respondent to make necessary arrangements in preserving the CCTV footage of Museum Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram from 13.05.2025 to 15.05.2025 and 22.05.2025 to 23.05.2025 including footages of Front Entry, GD Desk, SI Cabin , Crime Wing Camera, SHO Cabin.
B) Pass such other writ order or direction that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case; and”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. The petitioner seeks preservation of the CCTV footage of Museum Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, from 13.05.2025 to 15.05.2025 and from 22.05.2025 to 23.05.2025, including the audio and footage from the Front Entry, GD Desk, SI Cabin, Crime Wing Camera, and SHO Cabin.
4. The petitioner is accused No.3 in Crime No.879/2025 of Museum Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, facing offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of IPC. She was arrested by the Museum Police. The petitioner alleges that she was harassed by the Museum Police from 13.05.2025 to 15.05.2025 and 22.05.2025 to
23.05.2025 by the Police Officials.
5. The petitioner filed a complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner contends that the CCTV footage, sought to be preserved, would reveal what really transpired in the Police Station. It is the case of the petitioner that the CCTV footage and the audio clips show that the crime registered against her is fabricated.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the CCTV footage and audio clips sought to be preserved are kept intact. This submission is recorded.
7. The parties are at liberty to approach the Jurisdictional Court seeking further orders in the matter. However, there will be a direction to the respondents to preserve the CCTV footage and audio clips subject to the orders of the Jurisdictional Court.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.