SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6354

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
M/S. RADHAKRISHNA TEXTILE COLLECTIONS – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOSSY KURIAN, SHRI.ARUN KUMAR M.A
For the Respondents: SMT.KRISHNA S., CGC, SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SMT.M.S.KIRAN, SHRI.REMESH KARTHA, E.K., SMT.MUNDANCHERI SREELAKSHMI SREEKUMAR, SMT.SUMATHY DANDAPANI (SR.)

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 within a time limit.

2. The learned standing counsel for the 2nd respondent made available the copy of the order dated 30/12/2025, by which the said Ext.P6 complaint was disposed of.

3. In such case, the 2nd respondent is directed to communicate the said order to the complainant within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE sms APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 46075 OF 2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LOAN AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND

3RD RESPONDENT DATED 14.07.2020 EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SANCTION LETTER ISSUED BY THE HDFC BANK, ERNAKULAM TO THE PETITIONER DATED 12.08.2021 EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR RBI/2013-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top