Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6355

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
PONNAMMA MAMMEN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7633 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BABU CHERUKARA, SHRI.ARUN BABU
For the Respondents: ARUNKUMAR A., SC, KSEB, SRI. P.S. APPU, GP.

The court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed due to the petitioner's death.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to WP

(C) No. 7633 of 2023 before the High Court of Kerala. The petitioner, Ponnamma Mammen, has expired, leading to the submission that the writ petition is not pressed, resulting in the court's determination to dismiss it as not pressed. The court recorded the submission and dismissed the petition without further proceedings.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is no more and the writ petition is not pressed. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6355

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JPONNAMMA MAMMEN – AppellantVersusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT – RespondentWP(C) NO. 7633 OF 2023

The court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed due to the petitioner's death.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
PONNAMMA MAMMEN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7633 OF 2023