Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALEE KRISHNA S., J
SAMEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the conviction of the accused is affirmed based on evidence of rash driving. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the appellate court dismissed the challenge against the conviction. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments for modification of sentence based on elapsed time and circumstances. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. the court's supervisory jurisdiction is clarified for revisional petitions. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. the sentence is modified with specific directives for compensation. (Para 17) |
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 by the convict in C.C.No.420 of 2010 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Perintalmanna, who was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 279 and 338 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 279 of with default sentence of simple imprisonment for one month and to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 338 of with default sentence of simple imprisonment for one month.
2. The prosecution case is that, on 17.03.2007 a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
