SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6359

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
V.K.MOHANAN – Appellant
Versus
NITTA GELATIN INDIA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.V.N.SUNIL KUMAR
For the Respondents: SMT.LATHA ANAND, SHRI.SHEEJO CHACKO, SRI.S.VISHNU (ARIKKATTIL), SHRI.V.PREMCHAND, SMT.SURYA MOHAN P.

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 30th day of January, 2026 The writ petition is preferred challenging Ext.P1 order passed by the District Collector facilitating dredging of the channel for drawing water from the Chalakkudy River to the respondent- Company. The contention of the petitioner is that he had preferred a complaint before the Panchayat stating that the Company was unauthorisedly drawing water from the Chalakkudy River by creating water channels and that, without providing any filtration process, effluent was being discharged into the river, thereby causing havoc in the locality.

On going through the contentions, it appears that the apprehension voiced by the petitioner has already been addressed, as the Company has taken measures to filter the water before it is discharged into the river. As of now, the effluent discharge is being monitored by the Pollution Control Board. Under such circumstances, the grievance raised by the petitioner in this writ petition cannot be sustained.

Accordingly, the writ petition is closed.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top