Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
M.G.LEENA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 3 0 t h day of January, 202 6 This writ petition is preferred by a junior Hindi teacher who was appointed against a leave vacancy in the 5th respondent school from 19.07.1993 to 30.03.1994. Thereafter, the petitioner was engaged in the school on two occasions. Finally, she was appointed as HSA (Hindi) in the additional division vacancy in the 5th respondent school from 30.07.2008, but the said appointment was approved only w.e.f. 01.06.2011 onwards. Being aggrieved by that, the petitioner preferred this writ petition.
However, a counter affidavit is filed by the 4th respondent which says that, based on the Government Order, the Director of General Education also issued directions as per Order No. EC 4/2355/2021 dated 07.10.2021. Accordingly, the application submitted by the Manager was re-examined and it was found that the required vacancies to accommodate the petitioner were available during the years 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11.
Accordingl
The timely approval of teacher appointments is critical for educational administration.
A petition becomes infructuous if subsequent administrative actions resolve the primary issue.
The court reaffirmed that judicial decisions regarding employment rights must be respected, and that grounds for termination or denial of appointment must be substantiated with valid evidence, partic....
Court directed the revisional authority to expeditiously decide on the approval of appointments based on merit, emphasizing timely administrative action.
Government must consider pending representations and existing vacancies when approving appointments.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that obtaining permission from the competent authority before making an appointment in an educational institution is crucial for approval, and the ....
The court emphasized the need for a detailed enquiry into the appointment of the petitioners and highlighted the importance of compliance with rules for salary release and eligibility determination.
The court established that the principles of natural justice must be strictly followed in employment termination cases, particularly in the context of private educational institutions, and that the a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article