Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6368

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHAMSEER N K – Appellant
Versus
BIJU – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3135 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.9528 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.FARHANA K.H., SHRI.MUHASIN K.M.
For the Respondents: VIDYA KURIAKOSE SR.GP

Compliance with earlier judgment obviates further directions in contempt proceedings.

Headnote:This judgment relates to Contempt Case No. 3135 of 2025 against the judgment dated 13.03.2025 in WP

(C) No. 9528 of 2025. The court found that the directions given in the earlier judgment had been complied with, hence no further directions were necessary. The case was therefore closed as the compliance was accepted.

JUDGMENT

When this contempt case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 13.03.2025 is complied with.

If that is the case no further direction is necessary.

Therefore, this contempt case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6368

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JSHAMSEER N K – AppellantVersusBIJU – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 3135 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.9528 OF 2025

Compliance with earlier judgment obviates further directions in contempt proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHAMSEER N K – Appellant
Versus
BIJU – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3135 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.9528 OF 2025