JUDGMENT

This review petition is filed to review the judgment dated 07.01.2026 in W.P.(C.) No. 44455/2025. This Court as per the above judgment directed respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in the writ petition to take necessary steps to implement Ext.P5 minutes produced in that writ petition. The main contention of the review petitioner is that Ext.P5 minutes is a forged one. Th review petitioner produced the original extract as Annexure- A3 is the submission. I do not want to make any observation about the same. Admittedly, the writ petition was disposed without hearing the review petitioner because there was no appearance for the review petitioner. The counsel for the review petitioner submitted that he was not able to file the vakalath in time. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I think the judgment can be reviewed and the writ petition can be restored. The writ petition can be heard after hearing both sides.

Therefore, the review petition is allowed. The judgment dated 07.01.2026 in W.P.(C.) No. 44455/2025 is recalled and the writ petition is restored.

Sd/-