Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
UMMER BAVA – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's prayer is seeking timely consideration of an application. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondent must act upon the application as suggested. (Para 2) |
| 3. court ordered expedient actions for compliance. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"(i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass final orders on Ext.P2 application in accordance with law within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
(ii) To dispense with production of the translation of documents in vernacular language;
And (iii) Issue any such other writ order or directions as this Hon’ble Court deem fit in the interest of justice."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P2 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 application within a time frame. Therefore, this Wr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
