IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOSHY THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY CHATHAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHYATH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs: “a) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, directing the 1 st respondent to consider, take a decision on Ext.P3 complaint and to take appropriate action against the 2 nd respondent with regard to the compound wall on the southern side of his property which is causing great danger to the life and property of the petitioner;
b) Dispense with the translations into English of Exts.P1, P3 and P4 which are in Malayalam; AND c) Grant such other or further relief as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the particular facts and circumstances of the case. ”
[SIC]
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3.
3. The manner in which this writ petition is going to be disposed of, no notice is necessary to the respondents. If the respondents are aggrieved by any of the directions issued by this Court, the respondents are free to file review petition before this Court.
4. Since, the petitioner’s prayer is only for consideration of Ext
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.