IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
AFSAL M M – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PALAKKAD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"I. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit-P2 application dated 05.11.2025 submitted by the petitioner before the first respondent under section 5 (4) (i) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble court;
II. To dispense with the production of the English translation of the documents in vernacular language; and III. Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P2 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 application within a time frame. Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 2nd respondent is direc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.