SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6385

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
LEELA.M., SATHEESH KUMAR, ANOOP KUMAR, SUDHEESHMA.P, SANJAY KRISHNA.M – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3453 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.G.SANTHOSH KUMAR (P), SMT.GOPIKA RAMESH
For the Respondents: VIDYA KURIAKOSE SR.GP

Determining land classification and re-assessment of land tax requires clarity on possession before further proceedings.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The writ petition pertains to relief under the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 regarding land classification. Facts of the Case: Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus for change of land nature and re-assessment as per Ext.P10.

Findings of Court:
The application cannot be processed without possession clarity.

Issues: Whether the writ petition can attain finality based on existing possession.

Ratio Decidendi: The court suggests refiling the Form 6 application for matters related to property possession.

Result: This writ petition is disposed of.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks finality on land classification. (Para 1)
2. possession details impact application processing. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

"(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to the 1st respondent to attain finality on Ext.P10 and to issue an order for change of nature of the land comprised in Re-Sy.No.133/1 (133/27 as per TP) of Cheruvannur Village, Kozhikode Taluk as dry land for any other purposes as requested by the Petitioners within a time frame as fixed by this Hon’ble Court;

(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to the 2nd respondent to change the nature of property owned by the petitioners in the BTR and also to re-assess the Basic Tax Register accordingly as provided under Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 within a time frame;

(iii) Issue such other order as this Hon'ble court deems fit and necessary in the facts and circumstance of the case.

(iv) To dispense with filing of translation of the vernacular documents. "

[SIC]

2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader takes me through Paragraph No.2 of the writ petition, and also the tax receipt, in which it is stated that the land in possession of the petitioner is only 1.92 Ares (4.74 cents). The Government Pleader also takes me through Ext.P10 Form 6 application, in which the extent is shown as 2 Ares 21.4 Square metre. 3. If that is the case, the Form 6 application cannot be processed for the entire extent, for which the petitioner is not in possession. Therefore, the petitioner is free to file appropriate Form 6 application afresh, and move the writ petition before this Court, if there is any further delay.

With the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top