IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHAJIMON E M – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3560 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed for mandamus to direct action on application. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner satisfied with direction for timely consideration. (Para 2) |
| 3. court acknowledges hearing of both parties. (Para 3) |
| 4. directive issued for report submission and application consideration. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i)issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ or order directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders in Exhibit P4 application filed by the petitioner in Form 5 under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet land Act, 2008; within such time which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to grant.
ii)dispense with the production of the English translation of Exhibits which are in vernacular language; and iii)grant such other reliefs as this Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P4 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P4 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P4 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised O expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O consider Ext.P4 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st and 3rd respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE AJ
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LATEST LAND TAX RECEIPT BEARING THANDAPPER NO 26583 DATED 20/06/2025 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT VILLAGE OFFICER TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE BEARING NO. 94843036 DATED 22/06/2025 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE THANDAPPER ACCOUNT REGISTER EXTRACT WITH NO. 312/2025/243347 DATED 22/06/2025 MAINTAINED BY THE GOVT OF KERALA Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION BEARING NO. 302/2025/924566 DATED 16/09/2025 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of Judgment
30.01.2026
Judgment dictated
30.01.2026
Draft judgment placed
31.01.2026
Final Judgment uploaded
02.02.2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.