IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SHAJIMON E M – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PALAKKAD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i)issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ or order directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders in Exhibit P4 application filed by the petitioner in Form 5 under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet land Act , 2008; within such time which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to grant.
ii)dispense with the production of the English translation of Exhibits which are in vernacular language; and iii)grant such other reliefs as this Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P4 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P4 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P4 applicat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.