IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BEERANKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
" i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the 3rd respondent to conduct expeditious inquiry and to dispose of Exhibit -P1 Application, within a time limit to be specified by this honourable court.
ii. Pass an order to dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents produced in the above case.
iii. Grant any other Writ, Order, or direction as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P1 Form – 7 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P1 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The respondents 5 and 6 are directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P1 application to the 3rd respondent/Authorised Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.