IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ABHILASH – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the first respondent and third respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P5 application in accordance with law within the shortest time period possible.
ii. To dispense with filing of the translation of Vernacular Documents.
iii. Allow the Writ petition with costs.
iv. Grant such other further reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(SIC)
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P5 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P5 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P5 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.