IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ALBIN THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41557 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks timely consideration of application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court hears both sides regarding application. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs immediate action on application. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) To issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the 3rd respondent to dispose of Ext. P3 application in Form 5 submitted by petitioner as expeditiously as possible within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
ii) Dispense with the translation of vernacular documents;
iii) To grant such other reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext. P3 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 5th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P3 application to the 3rd respondent/Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 3rd respondent/Authorised O directed to consider Ext. P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 5th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 3rd and 5th respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE DM
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DOC NO.679/2023 OF SRO SREEMOOLANAGARAM DATED
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of judgment
30.01.2026
Judgment dictated
30.01.2026
Draft Judgment Placed
31.01.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded
31.01.2026
25/03/2023 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.