IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JOLLY THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
CORPORATION OF KOCHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner challenges a closure notice citing improper waste management. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. directions are given for inspection and representation regarding the notice. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“(i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order and quash Ext. P5 notice;
(ii) Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents;
(iii) Grant any other appropriate relief, which is prayed by the petitioner during the course of hearing which this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” (SIC)
2. The petitioner is conducting a business in Fish, Chicken etc., at Vyapar Bhavan Building at Alinchuvadu, Vennala is the submission. It is the case of the petitioner that he is doing the business for the last 23 years. The 3rd respondent issued Ext.P5 notice to the petitioner to close down the shop within 48 hours.
Aggrieved by the same, this Writ Petition is filed.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel appearing for the Corporation.
4. This Court perused Ext.P5 notice. Ext.P5 is issued by the Health Inspector
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.