Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ASHREF K.A – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks directives for timely decision on property applications. (Para 1) |
| 2. details of form-6 and form-9 applications are discussed. (Para 2) |
| 3. court directs procedural compliance for property application consideration. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
i) Call for the records pertaining to Ext P4 application submitted by the petitioner.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus, any other writ, appropriate order directing the 2nd Respondent or 3rd respondent Authorized Officer to call for report from the 5th Respondent within a time frame on the form 9 application –
Ext P 4 preferred by the petitioner.
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus, any other writ, appropriate order directing the 2nd or 3rd Respondent- Authorized officer consider Ext P 4 and P 5 within a time frame.
iv) Issue a writ of mandamus, any other writ, appropriate order directing the 2nd Respondent or 3rd respondent Authorized Officer to consider and pass orders in Exhibit P4 application (Form 9) after obtaining all necessary inputs within a time frame.
v) Issue a writ of mandamus, any other writ, appropriate order directing the 2nd respondent or 3rd respondent Authorized
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
